Peachtree Golf Club- Holes 10-18

Front Nine review HERE

Holes #10: Par 5, 519/503 yards
This is the only hole on the course that has a feature which can be considered somewhat unfair for lesser golfers but not in play for the better player, i.e. a bad feature. But that will be looked at in a moment. This hole is a generally straightforward par 5. As with many holes here at Peachtree, hole location will determine which side of the fairway is correct. In normal fashion, if the hole is cut front right, the left side of the fairway is preferred. From here the hole differs from the previous holes. Center hole locations are best approached from the right side of the fairway. The right side will yield a straight shot to the center of the green. However, holes cut in the far left portion of the green are very difficult to access with an aerial shot. For this hole location, either side of the fairway can be used, but the left side of the fairway will require the player hit a severe draw to the center of the green and let the fall roll down to the hole; the right side of the fairway will let the player hit a normal draw to the center of the green and, again, let it funnel back to the hole.

The above options are based on the golfer being able to go to the green in two shots and having to avoid the large bunker short of the green and the greenside bunker. The player laying up had better be able to pick a preferred yardage for the approach shot because the bottom of the flag will be obscured from the player and on left side locations, the entire flagstick may be out of view. The shot to the green will likely play two clubs uphill.

 From the tee, the bottom of the fairway is blind to the player. The creek visible in the above aerial is not in play from the tee. The fairway is basically flat and the player will be able to aim down the correct side and not have to worry about the ball rolling into the rough.

From the left side of the fairway, the opening to the right side of the green can be seen. The difficulty in accessing a left hole location can be seen here; were the hole cut far left, the flat would actually be to the left of the clean-up stripe on the fairway.

The semi-unfair feature mentioned in the beginning is the creek that cuts through the fairway. This creek provides no hazard at all for better players. But for average players hitting 225 yards or so off the tee, the creek is a significant hazard in trying to get across. Perhaps this is how Mr. Jones intended the hole to be played in 1948, have distance off the tee determine if the player can carry the creek or not and have a short shot to the green. Either way, in the modern game, this feature provides a potentially large penalty to the average player and virtually no penalty to the better player. This is the only feature this writer would change on the course.

Hole #11: Par 3, 220/180 yards

This is a very simple, though long, par 3. There is the slight chance to roll the ball onto the green, but the slope in front of the green makes that difficult. Overall, on this hole, the player will simply be asked to pick a yardage, pick a target, and hit a shot. This is a good rest hole prior to the difficult stretch upcoming.

Playing through a valley, the roll-up option is there, though is would likely be a difficult shot to pull off in normal conditions.

Hole #12: Par 4, 486/431 yards

This is the longest par 4 on the course and may well be the best. This sharp dogleg must be played different ways depending on how long the player can hit his tee shot. The back tee is located at the single purple spot at the very bottom of the picture below. A 275 yard tee shot will wind up at the double purple dots; a 300 yard drive will end up at the two orange spots. As you can see, if the 275 yard player hits his shot up the right side of the fairway, his approach will be blocked out by the trees. This player must play to the center or left side of the fairway, leaving another 225+ yards to the center of the green. The 300 yard player can hit his tee shot down the far right of the fairway, cutting down to perhaps 175 yards to the green. However, both of these shots will play one club longer due to the approach being substantially uphill. On top of all this, the setting of the green is exceptional.

 This shot taken from the 431 yard tee shows the blind tee shot down to the fairway. The downhill nature of the hole will help the player, but not greatly. If from the back tees, the 300 yard player could play directly down the right treeline, the 275 yard player will need to play directly over the tee boxes or slightly left of that.

Playing uphill to the green, the opening to the green is open enough to accept running shots, but the bunkers are there to provide penalty for shots hit off line. Players will need to take one extra club to get to the green.

Hole #13: Par 4, 470/385 yards
This is a solid and difficult par 4. Length off the tee is always a determining factor in how to play a given hole, but here it is key. Longer players, those that hit the ball out to 290 yards or more off the tee can play to any given point in the fairway and have a simple shot to the green with a middle iron. For these players, the bunkers in front of the green merely force them to guard against being short. Moderate length players, those hitting over 260 or so off the tee, have a different approach shot given that they will be playing from over 200 yards. These players should play up the left side so that they may use the kick-slope on the left side of the green in order to funnel the ball to the hole using ground contours. 

From the middle tee, the plays are simple. Down the treeline will leave the player with a shorter shot, up the left will give the best line if one is trying to use the kick-slope.

From the fairway, the kick-slope is visible on the left side of the green.

Hole #14: Par 3, 183/166 yards
There is little to be said about this hole that can not be seen in the pictures. Hit the green, or very close to is, or you will likely be in the water or playing a bunker shot towards the water. Certainly this hole fits the bill for a Heroic Shot.

Hole #15: Par 4, 470/411 yards
This hole starts off a fantastic closing stretch. As seen before out here, hole location determines which side of the fairway is preferred. Left hole locations are best approached from the right side; right hole locations are best approached from the left side. The creek visible in the image below is possibly in reach from the tee for the longest players due to the significant slope downhill towards the creek.

The left to right slope of the fairway can be seen here. Hugging the treeline is necessary for those players wanting to hit in the left side of the fairway.

The cluster of players on the green marks the hole location here. The line from the left side of the fairway is clear, avoiding the bunkers. From the right side, the player would be forced to play over the greenside bunker.

Hole #15: Par 5, 577/510 yards
This is a solid par 5 that might be reachable for the longest players, but it right at the range that will have all the better players scratching their heads. The player must have in mind off the tee if he intends to go for the green in two shots. If so, the better play is up the right side of the fairway. If not, the play is the left side of the fairway. The left side of the fairway opens up the second fairway, across the creek, more to the player. The right side will give the player going for the green in two, or trying to get very close, a better angle around the two fronting bunkers.

This fairway slopes right to left off the same hill that slopes the 15th hole. Shots played to the right side of the fairway should be started near the treeline in order to stay on the right side.

From the left side of the fairway, roughly 240 yards from the green, the second fairway can be seen along with the small pond. The large bunker short of the green makes going for the green from this side of the fairway problematic.

This is the view from the right-center of the fairway, perhaps 175 yards from the green. This is roughly the angle that would be seen from 250+ yards out. From this angle, the bunkers can be more easily navigated, but the pond and secondary fairway angle would make the lay-up shot more difficult.

Hole #17: Par 4, 420/391 yards
For one of the few times in the round, the best line of play off the tee is dictated to the player. The green angles away from the player left to right and has bunkers in front, making the preferred side of the fairway the left side. The left side will give the player a longer part of the green to work with and can also yield a run-up option for the player.

The fairway lays out nicely in front of the player. A play right towards the overhanging limbs of the pine tree will be perfect.

From the left side, the bunkers can be avoided and, although uphill, the player can attempt to roll the ball onto the putting surface if he wishes.

Hole #18: Par 4, 420/394 yards
The final hole of the day is one of only three holes with a fairway bunker. However, unlike the bunkers on #1 and #9, the usefulness of this one is not clear. The left side of the fairway does not seem to yield a better line of approach to the green over the right side. As it stands now, the final hole comes in as a hole where the entire protection for the hole is at the green. The green has a huge fall off short and will cause balls to roll back 10-20 yards off the green. This is a great hole to close out the round, giving the player a great chance to close with birdie if he can hit two solid shots.

From the tee, the bunker sits there staring at the player. Typically, that means the preferred angle is near there, but in this situation, that does not appear to be the case.

From over the bunker, this approach awaits the player. The bottom of the flagstick is not visible to the player making the shot more difficult.

The front roll-off area is visible here.

Overall, this course is very, very good. The shot making requirements from start to finish are high but not to high as to keep the course from being fun for the average golfer. It might be noted by the reader that there was little mention of the greens. As a rule, the greens had great features, but not the kind that come out well in photographs. The features were small and sweeping with the majority of the green being sloped as opposed to modern greens where the slopes are huge and bold and the rest of the green is virtually flat. These are some of the finest greens this writer has seen. That coupled with the shot requirements and flow in the round yields a fantastic golf course. 8 out of 10

Individual Hole Length

When looking at long golf courses, often times people obsess over the total length of the course. While total length is certainly a meaningful number to view, individual hole lengths are very relevant. Looking at individual hole lengths also determines if the course is really willing to take the golfer outside of his comfort zone with respect to length. Courses can also use hole length to maniuplate length into whatever they want. And individual hole lengths can also be used to determine the variety of challenge the player will face on the course.

It is rather easy for courses to climb to monsterous yardages. 7200 yards used to be considered extraordinarily long, but in reality, 7200 simply amounts to 18 holes averaging 400 yards. Certainly 400 yards is not a long hole. Bump the average up to 450 yards and the total length becomes 8100 yards. Once again, 450 yards is not an exceptionally long hole. But in many ways, courses seeking to be long simply for the sake of being long fail to realize that long is possible while also retaining variety. One of the newest courses on the Robert Trent Jones Golf Trail, Fighting Joe at The Shoals Golf Club, manages to stretch out over 8000 yards, but does so with limited variety. Consider what is a "comfortable" yardage on a give hole. On a par 3, perhaps the comfort zone for golfers off the back tees is 150-235 yards. Par 4's probably range from 400-500 yards, while par 5's range from 500-625 yards. The Fighting Joe manages to reach close to 8100 yards, yet it has only one hole that falls more than slightly outside those comfort zones, that being the par 5 12th hole that plays 716 yards (the 5th and 9th holes are 236 yard par 3's, but 1 yard isn't a vast distance). Why is this? Why does this course feature such monsterous length, yet not require the better player to approach a par 4 with more than a 4 or 5 iron? How does it get that long and not require the better player to hit a 3 wood (or even a driver) into a par 3? Truth is, the course does very well and keeps the golfer inside their comfort zone on virtually every single hole. Never is the golfer asked to hit a 3 wood approach on a par 4; for golfers with any business at all playing a course of this length, that hole would need to be 550+ yards long. Never is the golfer asked to hit a driver into a par 3. So, it would seem that courses take great pains to make sure that hole length does not reach outside the normal comfort zones; even The International outside Boston, one of the longest courses in the world at 8325 yards, has only 6 holes falling outside the comfort yardages.

By keeping the individual holes within these comfort yardages, most specifically the lower limits, clubs are able to more easily determine the targeted total length of the course. It is difficult for a course like Pebble Beach to attain what many would consider  to be long yardage because the course has 9 holes that are very close to the bottom end of the comfort zones. However, the course rating is 2.7 strokes over par and the Slope is very high at 143. What so many courses miss in the quest for length is variety in hole length. But again, having holes top out at yardages near the lower end of the comfort zones makes it more difficult for courses to have top end yardages near the current "long" standard of 7200 +/- yards. This seems to be what most courses view as an acceptable yardage from the back tees. But the strange thing is, many courses fail to see that the best modern courses manage to test both the lower limits and upper limits equally, making the golfer uncomfortable by giving them long shots to greens and short shots to greens.

Here lies the key negative in keeping hole lengths within the safe areas. In order to do that, variety has to be sacrificed. A look down some of the best courses in golf, Oakmont, Pine Valley, Pebble Beach, The Old Course,  shows that the best courses have the length necessary to challenge the best players in the world, but also have significant variety in the shots required from the player. On these, and other great courses, players will find par 3's ranging from the 106 yard 7th at Pebble Beach to the 288 yard 8th at Oakmont, par 4's from the 294 yard 7th at Olympic (Lake) to the 505 yard 9th at Pebble Beach, and par 5's from the 476 yard 10th at Cypress Point to the 636 yard 7th at Pine Valley (or the 670 yard 16th at Olympic (Lake) if members are allowed to play that tee). Bottom line is, most of these courses certainly meet any need for difficulty, even if they may not meet some target yardage. And most of the time, shooting for a target number simply yields a boring golf course.

Courses can go about searching for yardage all they want, but the truth is, golfers want variety and they want interest. Interest does not come from having 10 par 4's all play between 410 and 455 yards. It comes from having one play 295 yards, one play 535 yards, and 8 others scattered in between. Same with par 3's and par 5's. Variety is the key to having a greatly interesting and high quality golf course. Sadly, in the quest for length, many new courses disregard that thought. Perhaps one day these courses will get back to top quality variety coupled with top end length.

Mike Strantz & the C.B. Macdonald Template Holes

Mike Strantz is viewed by many in the golf community as a revolutionary designer. Some of the things he produced on golf courses were visually stunning and unlike little that had been seen before. But once you start digging a bit, get past the shock value visual features, there seem to be some definite old style golf features and even some of the Macdonald School template holes. Now, to be sure, these holes do not look like the simple, yet elegant, templates that Macdonald, Raynor and Banks crafted, but the visual features and playing features are there and show up far too often to be simple coincidence.

The most well known of the Macdonald School holes are the Biarritz, Redan, Punchbowl, Sahara, Cape, Road, and Alps. All of these holes show up at least once on Strantz courses, some of them more. Certainly Strantz went and put his own unique touch on these holes, but the strategic features are still there.

All images, with exception of Bulls Bay images, taken by and used with permission from The Buffalo Golfer: http://www.buffalogolfer.com

Bulls Bay images taken by and used with permission from S. R. Arble.

Biarritz
This is a hole that Strantz created twice. The basic feature of the biarritz hole has been described here before, but generally the hole is defined by a large depression in the middle of the green running side to side. The player is given the opportunity to bring the ball in low, landing it on the front of the green, and rolling to the back.

Tobacco Road, Hole #3, 152 yards

Here, the green starts just beyond the front bunkers, dips down, and rises sharply to the back level. Perhaps not a true Biarritz given that the back level is above that of the front, but the depression and two tiered green is there.

Royal New Kent, Hole #7, 197 yards

This hole is a biarritz/redan hybrid. The depression with two tiers is there, but so is the right-to-left angle and the front kick slope. Strantz used the creek bed in lieu of a bunker as the fronting hazard and put the two pot bunkers in as the rear hazard. The bunkers short of the kick slope are traditional redan features.

Redan

Strantz also crafted this hole twice. The standard Redan has a green that is angled roughly forty-five degrees right-to-left away from the player. Traditionally, the hole has a deep bunker fronting the green and another bunker behind the green to catch shots going long. The hole is also marked by the front to back slope, allowing the players to roll the ball to the back of the green, and the bunkers that are typically short of the front kick slope, bringing distance control more into focus for the player.

Royal New Kent, Hole #7, 197 yards

--Profiled above

Bulls Bay, Hole #7, 180 yards

This hole features the standard Redan shape and the front slope into the opening, However, it lacks the cross bunkers and rear bunker.

Punchbowl

This is a hole that Strantz used a number of times. The basic idea of the Punchbowl is that the green is located in a natural bowl or depression. The slopes of the depression can either be part of the green or part of the surrounding area.

Tobacco Road, Hole #13, 573 yards

This green is most certainly located in a bowl. Much of the green is obscured from view when approaching from the fairway. Options could be incredible if the bowl walls were maintained with shorter turf rather than high love grass.

Bulls Bay, Hole #14, 190 yards

Here, you can see the entire rear and both sides of the green sloping down towards the center of the green. In this case, a portion of the surround is maintained as short turf. This gives the player the chance to use the slope to get a shot closer to the hole...or might improve the positioning of a poorly played shot as well.

Stonehouse, Hole #5, 431 yards

The features are fairly obvious here. Slopes coming into the center from all directions. This might be the most traditional of the punchbowls shown.

Cape

This hole has become something different than it originally was. The original Cape played as a dogleg but the green was located on a peninsula surrounded by water. The original hole has since been altered and today the Cape is typically defined as a dogleg hole where the player is given the option of picking a more or less aggressive line off the tee, typically cutting over some type of hazard. This hole concept is possibly the most copied hole in golf and Strantz made good use of the concept himself.

Tobacco Road, Hole #12, 419 yards

This hole bends significantly to the left around the bunker. The green is farther around the corner, not in the image. The player is able to play the tee shot as far out to the left as he dares.

Tot Hill Farm, Hole #5, 535 yards

While difficult to see in the image, the fairway here runs from right to left, away from the player. Inside the dogleg is a deep depression filled with small trees and shrubs. The most agressive line on this hole is towards the peak of the hill/mountain in the distance.

Royal New Kent, Hole #9, 407 yards

Here, the player is given the chance to pick his line over the creek that is just shy if the fairway. In prior years, the creek also served to separate the fairway on the left from a second fairway on the right. The bunkers await through the fairway to catch golfers getting a little too greedy on the conservative line.

Bulls Bay, Hole #5, 406 yards

This is the first of the Cape holes that really play over a water feature. The marshland must be carried here in order to reach the fairway and the player is able to play as far out right as he feels comfortable doing.

Road
As the name suggests, this hole is patterned after the Road hole 17th at The Old Course. The green typically is narrow and angles right to left. There is also normally a bunker short of the green, ideally a pot bunker to mimick the Road Hole Bunker and some type of hazard long of the green to represent the road itself.

This hole bears more than a passing resemblance to the Road Hole, even if it lacks the bunker short. The tall grass short provides the Road Hole Bunker feature and the wall long, there to keep balls from going onto the public road located about 10 yards beyond the hazard, provides the Road feature.

Alps
The idea here is typically to have some type of large hill feature obscuring the view of the green. Sometimes the player is given the chance to play to a disadvantaged side of the fairway in order to avoid it, other times that is not the case.

Tobacco Road, Hole #1, 558 yards

This from about 210 yards from the green, no sight of the green. The green sits about 75 yards beyond the mound in the center of the picture.

Royal New Kent, Hole #14, 344 yards

This hole allows the golfer the chance to see the green when playing to a proper location. Golfers who play tee shots to the flanks of the fairway will likely not be able to see the flag. This green is also located in a punchbowl.

Sahara

This hole plays up and over a dune or some type of sand feature that also prevents the player from seeing the ball come to rest in the fairway.

Tobacco Road, Hole #18, 432 yards

From the tee, this is what the player sees. The fairway begins directly over top of the hill but the vast majority of it is out of the player's view.

There are other examples that could be used for these hole type, certainly the Alps feature is one that Strantz uses with semi-regularity. Same with the Punchbowl. Also, you may note that no holes from True Blue and Caledonia, Strantz originals, or Monterey Peninsula (Shore) and Silver Creek Valley, Strantz redesigns, are mentioned here. I simply lack familiarity with those courses and am unable to determine if any of those holes fit into the template mold.

If you think I've missed any, and I probably have, feel free to let me know.

Mattaponi Springs Golf Club-Ruther Glen, VA

This is a fantastic course located a fair ways off of the beaten path north of Richmond, Virginia. The routing, in most places, makes great use of the terrain and even where it does not, the holes work out quite well. For the course to be located so far out of the way it gets fairly good attention, being ranked in the Golf Digest Top 100 Public courses. Based on other courses played, both on and off that list, this writer feels the course is deserving of such ranking. It is a very solid course. The only real weakness the course has is three holes in the middle of the back nine, 13, 16 and 17, that are routed over very flat land, surrounding a man-made lake, on top of a hill at the highest point on the course. But those have solid strategic value, even if they do feel a bit out of place.

Ranking:
Variety of Design: Very solid. The par 3's have variety as good as can be expected, as to par 4's and 5's. Variety in length among all holes is very good. Directional variety is as good as any, having 6 holes going Right, 5 going left, and 7 going straight. 7 3/4

Flow of the Course: The course does a very good job of taking the player up and down through the course of the round. Difficult holes are typically followed by breather holes and mundane holes followed by good ones. Adding in the fact that the course mixes up playing uphill and downhill, the course does a good job, though not a perfect one, of telling a story through the round. 7

Conditioning: The course was played during the spring season, Master's weekend, in fact, so the course might not have been as "green" as during high season. But the course had very firm fairways with solid turf cover to go along with a solid set of greens. Could have been fractionally better, but still very good. 7 3/4

Ease of Walking: Given the hilly site the course is a difficult walk, but not impossible. Generally the holes are routed somewhat close to each other, allowing for moderate to short walks between green and tee. 5

Atmosphere: Good. The club tries to be nothing more than it is, carries no amount of snobbery or the like. The club lives up to the standards set by the rankings and that adds to the history of the club. It also doesn't hurt that the course is privately owned, not owned by some huge corporation. Good, "throwback" type operation. 4

Total: 67 3/4

Holes to Note
Hole #1: Par 4, 446 yards
This is no bargain for an opening hole. Hole plays significantly downhill and has a pond awaiting the player at the end of the fairway. It is possible to reach the pond off the tee if the player hits the ball more than 300 yards from the tee, which given the downhill nature of the shot is quite possible. It is unknown why the pond is here, it certainly seems manmade. Perhaps is was needed to control run-off from the course. From the fairway, a semi-difficult shot awaits the player, coming over the pond to a slightly elevated green. This hole certainly does not give the golfer a "gentle handshake" to start the round.

From the tee, the golfer is afforded a great view of the hole and the surrounding country side. The best play is towards the right edge of the green with a slight draw if able. The farther left one is in the fairway, without being blocked of course, the better the angle for the approach shot becomes.

From the center of the fairway, the shot is rather simple, though not incredibly easy.

Hole #11: Par 4,413 yards

This hole features a double fairway set-up that allows the player to pick a side depending on how much rish he wishes to take. The left fairway is wider, but leaves a longer play to the green. The right fairway is narrow, and has disaster waiting down the right side, but will leave the player with a shorter shot to the green. The fairways are split by a cluster of trees, though they should not be in play for the golfer. The approach to the green changes little depending on side are far as angle and so forth. The left fairway is slightly more elevated giving a more level approach to the green.

From the tee, the two fairways wait. The better player, of course, can pick the fairway he wishes to play down and play to that point. The lesser player might simply aim for the trees, playing the percentages that he will not hit straight and will then find the fairway no matter which way he misses. Strategic for the best players, easy to play the the lesser ones? Seems to be a winning combination.

From outside the fairway down the left side, the green lies in wait on top of the hill. As seen here, the approach angle or difficulty would not be significantly different from either fairway, only change would be the yardage.

Hole #14: Par 3, 236 yards

The longest par 3 on the course plays over a large ravine and back up to a generous green. The design of the hole seems to prefer an aerial approach to the green since any ball landing short would have to be coming in quite fast to avoid getting stopped on the slope or, worse, coming back down the slope.

Hole #16: Par 5, 494 yards
This hole, while being out of place playing around a man made pond, it a solid hole strategically. The hole plays blind off the tee to a wide fairway. But being that it is blind, the player who has never played here does not know exactly how wide the fairway is, if is has significant slope or if it is heavily bunkered. This is the only blind tee shot on the course (it could be argued that the tee shot on 9 is blind, but that is only the case for the very longest of players) and that feature is used to full effect. Once arriving in the fairway, the player finds a very accomodating fairway with very little slope and no bunkering. From here, he must determine if he wants to go for the green in two or lay-up. Going for the green certainly brings the water right and short of the green into play. Laying up will bring the bunker that lies about 75 yards short of the green into play possibly. This is a solid risk-reward par 5 this late in the round.

The hole doesn't give the player much help from the tee. He simply must pick a line and hope it is the best (not knowing what lies in the fairway, of course)

This image, from the lay-up area, shows the flat nature of the fairway and gives a closer view ot the green site with the bunker and pond in play. This hole is very solid strategically, but the odd nature of the pond takes away from it, sadly.

Overall, this is a solid course. It certainly will not bore anyone from start to finish. The holes are solid and come together to form a very good course. The course is certainly deserving of it's ranking and very fun to play. 6 out of 10



Royal New Kent Golf Club-Providence Forge, VA

This is a high quality golf course as evidenced by it being Mike Strantz's only original course to break into the Golf Digest Top 100 in America; Monterey Peninsula (Shore) is Top 100, but that course is something of a hybrid renovation/new construction. This course has everything a person would expect to see at a Strantz designed course. Wild greens. Heroic shots. Views and expanses of golf that are difficult to describe in words. It really is a shame this course fell out of the Top 100 after only one ranking because it exemplifies everything that Strantz did as a designer.

Ranking
Variety of Design: Very good. The par three's lack variety slightly, not having a short hole. Par four's have great range, from 333 (playing effectively shorter than that) to 476 yards. The par five's feature one that is reachable for the aggressive player and three more that are all at the very outer reaches of making the green in two shots and will make the player think. Directionally, the course features seven holes going to the right, five holes going left, and six holes going straight. The course also features holes that allow running shots, along with uphill and downhill approaches.
8 1/4 out of 10

Flow of the Course: The course starts off with the traditional Strantz kick in the mouth. Following that, the course ebbs and flows nicely through the round, giving the player opportunities to be aggressive and attempt to gain a stroke or two, to take a breather, and also has holes where the player had best hunker down and hit a couple excellent shots. The eighteenth takes shots in some circles, but truthfully, most would not know the pond is manufactured unless they were told so. The hole provides a very good finish with multiple options. 8 out of 10

Course Conditioning: The conditioning was certainly on pace with the rest of the courses in the local area. Certainly it was not on the level of high end places like Eagle Point, but was generally solid. 7 1/4 out out of 10

Walkability: Not good. The course is on a less than perfect site and there is a housing component to the design. For all his positives, Mike Strantz was not the best at routing courses that could be easily walked. The good thing is that most of the longer walks are over flat ground and not directly up hills. 4 out of 10

Atmosphere: Good atmosphere here. Being one of only a handful of Strantz courses adds to the anticipation and the course does not disappoint. 4 out of 10

Total: 71.25

(all photos taken taken by and used with permission from The Buffalo Golfer: www.buffalogolfer.com)
Holes to Note
Hole #2: Par 5, 557 yards
The fishhook hole. This hole is essentially a Strantz template hole. This type hole exists on four of Strantz's seven East Coast courses, six if the basic principle and not style plus principle are included. It is called a fishhook because the hole is shaped as such. The hole plays out a certain distance and then cuts back 180 degrees before coming to the green. In all cases, the hole has some hazard in the middle. The hole here doglegs sharply to the right. The aggressive play from the tee is down the right side of the fairway, that will give the player the chance to go for the green with a mid to long iron. Players not going to the green in two will most likely still have to play over the hazard, unless they wish to play the hole as an effective par 6, but the landing area for lay-up shots is huge. There have likely been scores ranging from 2 to 20 on this hole over the years.

From the tee, the dividing line between fairway and rough is visible. What is not visible, however, is the grass hazard waiting just beyond the trees. Players hugging the right side of the fairway will have the shortest line to the green, obviously.

This player hit his tee shot about ten yards inside the right edge of the fairway. The green is reachable from here, but the hazard will do the player no favors.

A closer look at the hazard clearly shows a abyss awaiting the player should he come up short.

This is the shot that awaits the player who played conservatively on the second shot.

Hole #7: Par 3, 197 yards
This is certainly the best par 3 on the course and may be one of the top three or four in Southeastern Virginia. Strantz is known for his modern style of golf course, but if one looks closely features from the classic designers can be seen. The Alps concept from the Charles B. Macdonald School is a Strantz favorite. He has also used the Biarritz green template at least twice. This hole has what strongly resembles the biarritz green with the large depression in the center, but adds a twist on the template by angling the green like a redan and giving the player the run-up option with slope. The player is given numerous options here on this exceptional hole.

Hole #14: Par 4, 344 yards
This hole, in this writers mind, is the Strantz version of the Alps. The green is barely visible in the distance from the tee and there are two huge mounds flanking the clear opening to the green. Players must play to the center of the fairway or the view of the green may be blocked completely. The green does the player no favors being highly contoured, but a highly contoured green should be expected for a short hole like this.

From the tee, the player has a clear view of the task at hand. Depending on hole location, the player may want to favor the opposite side of the fairway a bit, but any shot hit too far off the center line will have the view of the green blocked.

The approach from 90-100 yards out. This shot was played to an aggressive yardage and is nearing the gap between the hills.

Hole #17: Par 5, 562 yards
Here the player will be given the chance to pick up one, possibly two shots if he is capable of hitting the necessary shots. The creek running down the right side of the fairway dictates all play. If the player has the guts and hits down the right side off the tee, then going for the green in two may be a possibility, but he will be required to play his shot over the trees or hit a huge fade. The conservative play will be out to the left and will not give the player a chance at going for the green in all likelihood, though the angle is better from the left, the distance makes it less then appetizing. From the landing area, the player will once again have to contend with the bunker should he want to go at the green in two. Players laying up are given a generous landing area. The green is not very deep, but quite wide.

The creek is not highly visible in the image, the it runs the entire length of the hole, pressed hard against the fairway. A play towards the bunkers will give the player a conservative line off the tee and an outside chance of going for the green in two.

From the right-center of the fairway about 275 yards off the tee, the green is not visible to the player. In order to go for the green in two, the player would either have to start his shot over the pond, aiming at the trees in the distance, or take his shot high over the center tall tree in the foreground. Otherwise, the player should aim for the bunkers in the distance and lay-up.

A rather simple shot awaits the player laying up, though it does have to be played across the creek.





Hole #18: Par 4, 463 yards
From the tee the player can either try to carry the two bunkers on the right or play to the huge open fairway on the left. In many ways, the less aggressive play is, in this case, preferred, as playing over the bunkers will yeild limited rewards. The shot to the green is a difficult one having to go across the water all the way to a green that is not very deep.

From the tee, the best play will take the player to the left of the twin bunkers. This opens up the fairway.

There are no opportunities to miss herre. Short, long or right will all find the water. This is likely not the shot any player wants after a long day with a few dollars on the line.

Overall, this course is very, very good. With a little more money to spend on conditioning, the course could be exceptional. But there is great variety here and the player will certainly need to be able to shape the ball to score well. In general, this course seems to be underrated in the world of golf. Not even top 20 in the state of Virgnina according to Golf Digest? Hardly. 7 out of 10.