Robert Trent Jones Golf Trail at Magnolia Grove (Short)

Same as with the Short course at Oxmoor Valley, it is difficult to really talk about a par 3 course. All the holes on this course require the player hit an aerial shot to the green. All the greens are elevated. But there is reasonable variety. Holes play as long as 215 on the card from the back tees (and can play 5-7 yards longer than that from the far back of the teeing area) and as short as 70 yards from the forward tees. For those not insistent on playing a single set of tees, every club in the bag, except perhaps the 3 wood and driver, can be used on the course. Overall, this is a good, above average, course.

Holes to Note

For the first time on this site, a tour of the entire course will be posted. This is the writers home course and he has played it 50 or more times just this year. All pictures and yardages from the back tees.

Hole #1: 174 yards

Proper distance and line are important right from the opening shot. The green is separated into three distinctly different tiers: the front part of the green is sunken, the back right portion is sunken as well. The middle tier is rather flat and perhaps two feet above the front and back portions.

Hole #2: 180 yards
Playing downhill over a wetland area, this is a semi-scenic hole. The shot requirement is roughly the same as the first hole. This green is separated into two tiers, front and back.

From the tee, the shot needed is quite clear.

The well defined rise can be seen here.

Looking back at the tee from behind the green.

Hole #3: 189 yards

A virtual twin of the second, this hole again plays downhill, over the wetlands. This green has less movement than the 2nd, however. 

Hole #4: 215 yards
This hole is the longest on the the course and plays to a four-tiered green that is far too extreme for the shot required. The idea of the hole is good, but the green is not at all suited to the hole.

Hole #5: 137 yards
A break from the long holes that start off the round. This hole plays roughly a club uphill to a two-tiered green. Certainly a potential birdie hole if you can hit a decent shot off the tee.

The rise in the green can be seen here.

Hole #6: 135 yards

The shortest hole on the front nine plays to a green on the same level as the tee. This green, while also highly undulated, fits the shot required, unlike the 4th green. This hole, depending upon the pin position is likely the easiest hole on the course. When the hole is cut center left any shot within a 10 yard wide semi-circle right of the hole will funnel right down to the cup.

Today, the hole is cut center left, as described above. Beyond the bunker, the green is shaped like a bowl, feeding shots to the hole.

The shadowing from the trees gives definition to the rise that separates the front part of the green from the left-center. The mound just left of the prominent pine tree shows the location of the rear dividing tier.

Looking from the rear of the green, the bowl is more clearly seen.

Hole #7: 190 yards

This is one of the few holes on the course that might actually require the player to shape for ball from the tee, at least when playing from the back tees. When the hole is cut in the back portion of the green, as in this picture, a fade off the tee will give the player easiest access to the hole.

Hole #8: 178 yards
This hole has one of the largest greens on the course, if not the largest. This green would be far better suited on the 4th hole. There is perhaps 10 feet of rise from front to back with 4 distinct tiers. The back left portion of this green also acts as a funnel for shots. This hole, due to the fantastic green, is likely the best hole on the course.

From the tee, the tiers are visible to the player. Any shot on the wrong tier above the hole will leave a very difficult putt.

The tiers are well defined and severe.

Hole #9: 160 yards
This hole plays sharply uphill, roughly a club and a half. Prior to a renovation in 2011, there was a huge put bunker directly in front of the green. Shame it is no longer there. As with most greens, this one has several distinctive tiers.

Hole #10: 173 yards
From the back tees, this hole can either be simple or a real terror. To a front hole location, the shot is easy, the rise that separates the front and back tiers is roughly 3 feet high and serves as a major backstop. To the back location, however, there is no room for error. A miss short and left will roll down to the front tier. A miss short and center will go into the bunker. Any shots long or right will deflect down a steep hill and leave something of an impossible up and down.

This shot most certainly did not end up in an ideal location and anything other than an outstanding putt will likely result in three putts.

Hole #11: 192 yards

Just a standard hole here. Tee and green on the same level, green roughly flat. One of the few holes on the course that is simple and understated.

Hole #12: 195 yards
Tough hole playing long and over the fronting bunker. Another reasonably simple shot to a green with a lower tier.

The lower and upper tiers are visible in this image.

Hole #13: 205 yards

The second longest hole on the course has a green that fits the shot. Green has a simple tier, enough movement to give interest to the hole. Would be a much better hole if the green were lowered 3 to 4 feet to allow for a run-up shot.

A simple rise separates the front and back of the green.

Hole #14: 190 yards

Another of the few holes on the course that calls for working the golf ball off the tee. The shape of the hole actually resembles as Redan and a draw off the tee is favorable. But as with all holes, a run-up shot is out of the question.

Hole #15: 110 yards
The shortest hole on the golf course is also the easiest. The bunker is virtually meaningless and the mounds on the right provide a kick onto the green. This is the final birdie hole before the final difficult stretch.

Hole #16: 192 yards
This hole plays slightly uphill to a three tiered green and over the same marsh that came into play on holes 2, 3 and 4. And in reality, this hole is a virtual copy of 2 and 3. The deep green can prompt indecision in the player having to determine how much to add to or take off the posted yardage.

Hole #17: 155 yards
This hole plays sharply uphill and to a green that slopes sharply from back to front. When the hole is cut in the front, any shots left above the hole leave a very difficult putt. This green also has several different levels, but they are a bit more subtle than the levels on some other greens.

Here you can see the 4 tiers. This image is taken from the back of the green, the green has tiers back left and right, then two tiers falling down towards the front of the green.

Hole #18: 170 yards

The closing hole plays a club uphill to a green that is semi-blind from the tee. Regardless of where the hole is cut, the player is unable to see the bottom of the flagstick. This hole is a fair closing hole, but nothing spectacular.

The 18th green has some interest, bringing difficulty to the final hole.

Overall, this is a solid course. The yardages are varied and as said before, can be extremely varied for players who play from all different tees. But without the ability to play the ball on the ground at least a few times, the shots get slightly repetitive. That coupled with a couple of over the top greens, detracts from the course a bit. But this course is still solid. 4 out of 10

High Quality Nine Hole Golf Courses: A Rarity

Everyone has played a nine hole golf course from time to time. But how often are those courses really that good? While these little courses certainly have a place in the world of golf, most of the time they are nothing special and simply give golfers a place to play. Of course, there is nothing wrong with that. Golf Digest published a list of the top 25 nine hole golf courses two years ago. If we are to assume the list does, indeed, rank the true top 25 nine hole courses, then it is rather indicative of the average quality of these courses nationwide. This writer has played two of them: #3 ranked Northwood and #24 ranked Annapolis Golf Course.

Northwood is an old Alister MacKenzie design in northern California. This course does have some interesting greens and some of the holes have quality shot values. But in other places, the trees have encroached on the course so much that it is virtually unplayable. The playing corridor on 9 is 25 yards wide. Not the fairway, the entire playing corridor, from the trees on the right to the out of bounds stakes on the left. The trees greatly effect turf quality as well. This course is not bad, just average; 3 out of 10 on the Johnny B. scale.

Annapolis Golf Course...well, to put it as nicely as possible, this just is not a course you would recommend to your friends. The fairways have no turf grass, only weeds mown to an inch in height. The greens are near perfect circles occupying the otherwise huge original green pads. Bunkers no longer have sand, only weeds. For the real student of architecture, the course is so good as to nearly brings tears to the eyes. But for a normal golfer, this might be the worst course he will ever see. The course was designed by Charles Banks, who learned design from Seth Raynor. The pedigree is outstanding. But the course has fallen into such disrepair as to completely prevent any interface with the architecture as it sits. Again, I fully assume due justice was done in coming to the conclusion that this is the 24th best 9 hole golf course in America. Given that is the case, it speaks volumes to the mediocrity of 9 hole courses in America.

One other course off that list worth a note is Pottawatomie Golf Course in Illinois. While this writer has not played it, another writer on Wegoblogger31.blogspot.com has ranked the course #305 out of 330 courses played as of this writing. Pottawatomie was ranked #15 on the 9 hole courses ranking.

Given these three examples and other 9 hole courses played, it would seem to be, sadly, the case that 9 hole courses are generally of a lower quality. That is not to say there are not good ones, indeed The Dunes Club in Michigan and Royal Worlington and Newmarket are widely acclaimed by a large number of people. But those seem to be great outliers.

This is quite sad really. 9 hole golf courses that are of high quality would be a great way to get golfers onto high quality golf courses without having to spend 4 or 5 hours on the course. The courses would also take up less land, making them cheaper to own, which should lead to lower costs passed on to the golfer. That would seem to be a winning combination, lower cost to the golfer and faster play.

Of course 9 hole courses exist everywhere. Some were originally designed that way. Some, like Annapolis, were designed to be part of an 18 hole facility, but only 9 were built. Some are what remains of a course that once had 18 holes, but for whatever reason had to close the other nine holes. But few are of solid quality.

Indeed, Northwoods is the finest 9 hole course this writer has played. But in an overall ranking, probably fits somewhere around 125 of 183. The other courses fall below that, some far below. It's quite sad that so few of these courses are built and maintained at even an average quality. Of course, the market yields this, few people want to play 9 hole courses, they even have a stigma, deserved these days, of being low quality courses. It would be great to see attitudes from golfers and operators change to allow for more of these little courses. The game would not suffer if that happened.

Moose Run Golf Course (Hill)- Fort Richardson, AK

This is the older and short course at Moose Run. This course is also a bit wider and generally easier than the Creek course. The two nines were built at different times, and while this writer does not know which nine was built first, there is an obvious quality difference between the two. The front nine occupies rolling land and has solid holes. The back nine occupies a very flat section of land and, sadly, is rather repetitive. The par 4's blend together on the back nine because they are all flat, though the one par 5 has some interest and is scenic playing back to the mountains. But this is simply an average course and, due to the back nine, the lowest quality course among the six 18 hole courses around Anchorage and out into the Valley.

Holes to Note

Hole #2: Par 4, 422 yards
From the tee, this hole bears a passing resemblance to the eighth hole at Pine Valley. The landing area is obscured by a large hill that enters from the left and slopes down across the fairway to the right. The best play is to aim for the center or left-center of the fairway and let the ball feed down to the right. The green is easy to approach from either side of the fairway, but players that reach the right side will be afforded a flatter lie and level approach. From the fairway, the player may choose to either fly the ball to the hole or bump it along the ground. The green is equally receptive to either shot with very limited protections from approach shots. Easy second hole and a fairly good chance for birdie.

From the tee, the hill is imposing and blocks the landing area from view. For those who have seen it, the resemblance to #8 at Pine Valley is readily visible. 

From the right side of the fairway, the green is easily accessed from a flat lie. The green sits in wait with limited protections.

Hole #5: Par 5, 518 yards

Solid par 5 that plays blind over the hill to the fairway. The hole bends to the left, but the player is given no indication of that from the tee. The best line is to play up the right side, leaving the player a chance to go for the green with a straight shot. From the top of the hill, the hole spreads out in front of the player and, while not an exceptionally strategic hole, it's certainly photogenic. The green is, like most here, lightly defended (the green actually has a bunker left and also long, but due to green shrinkage over time, they are so far offset that this writer failed to even notice them on the course and only saw them upon looking at the course from overhead).

 Completely blind off the tee, the player has no idea what is in store.

 Fortunately for him, there was no trouble awaiting in the fairway and the only concern is whether or not the ball ended up in the fairway and if he can make an attempt to go for the green in two shots.

From the 150 yard marker, the shot is uphill to the green and not very difficult.

This course could be a solid golf course if they did some work on it and perhaps brought in a professional designer to add a bit of interest to the back nine. It simply gets repetitive on the closing stretch. But there have been changes over time here. Bunker shrinkage can be seem in numerous places, as can green shrinkage. An aerial view of the front nine shows how far offset the bunkers are from the greens. If there existed some cash to spend on this course, it could be as good as the other courses in the area, if not better than some. 

The square edge indicates where the green used to be and how much rough encroachment exists on the third green.

This course is not bad, indeed it is actually average. It is actually something of a compliment to the quality of golf in this area overall that this course is at the bottom of the heap. For an area with as short a golfing season as Alaska, there exists a generally high quality of golf here. This course: 3 out of 10.

September 11 in America

Prior to 2001, September 11 was just another date on the calendar. There was nothing notable about that date. Sure there had been a few historical events that took place, a few noteworthy births and deaths, but nothing that made it anything other than an ordinary day. In 2001 that changed for Americans. For the first time in sixty years United States territory came under large scale attack. The history of that date is known by all. Just the same, everyone who witnessed the attack on TV, let alone those who saw it in living color, will remember where they were when they heard the news.

I was in college at the time, attending a community college in North Carolina. Assuming the building is still there 11 years later, I could show you within inches where I was sitting when I heard what happened. A TV was brought into the main cafeteria/common area for people to watch what was happening. The images of the aircraft hitting the towers, people jumping from 80th floor windows, the towers collapsing and any number of others will forever be burned into my mind.

It was not until I got in my car to drive home that I heard that the Pentagon had been attacked. This was most significant to me being from a military family and living in a military town, hearing that someone had been able to attack the Pentagon, the very symbol of the US military was shocking.

In the days that followed, I remember everyone trying to comprehend what had happened and really struggling to do so. I remember watching people show a general dislike of all Muslim people, a dislike, even hatred, that still exists in America today.

Since then, America has entered into wars going after those suspected to be part of the plot. After nearly ten years, we were able to find and kill Osama bin Laden. We have, hopefully, made it more difficult to be a terrorist.

We all need to take time today, everyday, to remember those Americans who died on September 11, 2001. Some were heros, some were innocent people going about their daily lives. All tragically died that day. We must carry on for those people.

As I was on the course today, I got to thinking about everything. I remembered this song that came out not too long after the attacks. It's a very good song and perhaps something that all people should listen to and apply in their lives.

Moose Run Golf Course (Creek)-Fort Richardson, AK

This is one of the newer courses in the State of Alaska and it shows. The creek crossings have significant buffer areas unlike Eagleglen where the golf course butts directly up to the same creek. The course is also longer than other courses in the state, playing 7,324 yards from the back markers. That yardage, coupled with the normal cooler temperatures in Alaska, make this course a formidable challenge for all golfers. In fact, this course seems to be the only course in Alaska ever ranked in a national ranking produced by a major publication, being ranked in the Top 50 Most Difficult Courses from Golf Digest. As a whole, this course comes together quite well and gives the golfer a nice up and down ride through a round.

Holes to Note

Hole #6: Par 3, 222 yards
This long par 3 plays over an old quarry in a stunning setting. As with many holes in Alaska, it is very difficult to judge distance and feel comfortable hitting a shot. Playing slightly downhill from tee to green gives the player some help given that a running approach is not possible. The modern bunker shapes are easily seen in this image.

Hole #11: Par 5, 640 yards
This hole is the longest hole in Alaska and certainly plays as such. From the tee the hole plays downhill to a rather flat landing area. The player is offered two lines off the tee. Playing close to the bunkers on the right will give the player a clear line on the second shot, but a less desired line to the green. Playing closer to the tree line on the left will force the player to carry a set of fairway bunkers in order to go to the green, or lay up short of them, but from there he will have the best angle into the green. This is one of the rare three shot par 5's that has interest on the second shot and is a fine hole because of that.

 From the tee, the player can see the bunkers lying in wait. He must choose to play towards the bunkers or away, depending on his skills and how aggressive he wishes to be.

 From the right side of the fairway, the green is only slightly in view. The bunkers on the left side can be seen here. The player can either play around them, leaving a poor angle to the green or test his luck going over them, given the preferred line to the green.

 Looking back from the green, the elevation change on this hole can be seen.

This course is very solid. No holes are very weak, but few are strong. One would be led to believe that the designer did the best he could given the site limitations with the creek. 5 out of 10

Cost of a Round of Golf

Theamount of money we pay to play a specific golf course depends on anumber of things. Availability, accessibility, desire to play,architectural interest (for some) and course conditions are some ofthe reasons. But what do these things mean individually and how dothey determine a fair rate?

Thereare two parts to this question. First, upon researching a course andgetting information on it, what do you feel the course is worth, siteunseen? Second, after you have played, was the price you paid worththe course you saw?

Howare we to define this five factors, however?

Thefirst two factors are used to formulate an opinion of the courseprior to knowing the rate.

ArchitecturalValue: This will mean different things to different people. Somegolfers might want courses with soft, understated features, like Old Macdonald or Rustic Canyon. Other golfers might want eye poppingvisual stimulation or "eye candy" like that seen at PebbleBeach or Shadow Creek. But each golfer knows roughly what he likes tosee in a golf course, what he considers great, good, average, bad andso forth. Any golfer will pay a premium price for a golf course thathe considers to be great. Just the same, very few, if any, golferswould pay a premium price for a course considered by them to beaverage or bad. It is up to the golfer to determine how he definesthese words in the context of golf courses.

Course Conditioning: This, again, is a subjective category. If a golferloves golf courses that play extremely firm, where the ball might beplayed along the ground and the turf flashes a yellowish-green color,the courses at Bandon Dunes will fit his eye quite well. If heprefers a vibrant green, be it firm or not, a course like Pine Valley or Pebble Beach will suit him better. But it is certainly on thegolfer to research and determine if the course in question fits hiseye. Soft and Slow, Firm and Fast, whatever the combination, golferswho prefer one style will pay to play golf courses that are of thatparticular style.

Fromthese two factors, the golfer is able to determine his desire to playthe course.

Desireto Play: For either of the above, and the two below as well, thedesire of the golfer to play a certain course greatly factors intowhat is a reasonable rate to pay. If the golfer has no desire to play Shadow Creek and would rather play the local municipal course, thenthe $500 rate will seen absurd. The golfer with a strong desirehowever, will do whatever it takes to come up with the $500 requiredto see the course.

Oncethe level of desire is established, the golfer works into the lasttwo steps, availability and accessibility.

Availability: How easy is it to obtain a tee time? Most golf courses charge moremoney for peak times and seasons. Some golf courses charge one ratefrom opening to noon, drop the rate at noon, and then drop the rateagain at 2 or 3 pm. So, people who want to play earlier in the daywhen the conditions and weather are more favorable must pay a primerate and a great number do. In the same way, golf courses typicallyhave peak seasons. In the North Carolina Sandhills, that peak isduring Spring and Fall. In Miami, peak is winter. In Michigan, peakis summer. Just the same as with peak times of the day, golferswishing to play during these peak seasons will pay a premium. It isup to the golfer to determine if it is worth it to him to pay thefull rate to play at these peak times; this writer chooses not toplay at peak times whenever possible. 

Accessibility: This basically boils down to the privacy level of the club. Thenormal public golfer might be willing to pay a significant premium toplay a private course simply because it is private, even though itmight be of lesser quality than the public options in the area. Ithas been said that some private clubs charge upwards of $700 forunaccompanied guests, $500 for accompanied. But because they are highend, highly ranked, exclusive courses, people pay the rate. There arepublic courses that charge rates this high as well, Pebble Beach andShadow Creek come to mind, and this ends up being an access point aswell. Pebble Beach is one of the top 5 courses in America and ShadowCreek is typically top 20 or better. There are a select handful ofpublic courses that are ranked that highly and golfers will have toopen up the wallets in order to play. This leads to the third factorin price and that is desire to play.

So,what then, is a reasonable amount to pay for a given course? For thiswriter, he uses the top two criteria to make a preliminarydetermination on where the course will fit on his 1 to 10 scale. Howgood does the course appear to be? Things to consider are the routingof the course, meaning is the course routed smoothly and can it bewalked. Courses that do not allow walking at all get marked downaccordingly. Does the course appear to have a solid variety of holes?Does it have a variety of shot selections? And is the course in topnotch condition; reasonably firm and fast is typically the desiredset-up. If the course is great, a 10, then the desire to play is highmeaning that all reasonable efforts will be made in order to play thecourse. If the course is average, the desire is average as well, thiscourse may be played if convenient. If the course seems poor, well,the desire will certainly be low and without some other circumstancesfactoring into the decision, this course will most likely be skipped.

Oncedesire is established, availability and accessibility are evaluated.Obviously the availability means looking at whether or not it is apeak season or peak rate time. Obviously in places like Minnesota,Michigan, New York, Canada, and other northern locales, the seasondoes not matter. If the course is open for play, it is basically peakseason and the golfer will be charged as such. But for Southernlocations, golf courses are open year round. Typically the golfcourse will not be vastly different from one season to the next,though this is not always the case. But take Doral, a high end resortin Miami, FL. The peak season rate to play the Blue Monster TPC is$325 and the off season rate is $210 (these rates valid according toDoral Resort website on September 5, 2012) The golfer must come to adecision if it is worth it to him to pay the $115 premium to play thecourse in January when the average high temperature is 76 or in Julywhen the high is 90. For this writer, it would not be worth thepremium, so the lower rate, out of season, would be the selection.Same goes with twilight hours. There is, in this writers mind, noneed or purpose whatsoever in paying extra money to play a course.Why pay $25 to play at 8am when you could pay $15 playing at 2pm?

Buthow does a rough breakdown go? What is a fair rate for a 10? What is fair for a 5?

Something like this is probably fitting:

10:Virtually no limit to what would be considered a fair rate. $495 wasconsidered fair at Pebble Beach. Other courses that might be 10's,Pinehurst #2, The Old Course, Augusta National, Pine Valley, would befairly priced that the rate and the necessary steps would be taken inorder to play.

9:There are more courses that fall in the 9 category than there are10's, certainly. But these are still rare. These courses would stillhave no ceiling for pricing. Shadow Creek charges $500 and that is afair rate to play there.

Belowthe 9 though, the rating gets more complex.

8: $250 is likely the max for an 8 without something else attached. Thepremium might sneak a little higher for a private club, special eventor something with exceptional history, but in general, $250 would bea maximum.

7: $150 max. These courses are somewhat easy to find, even on the publicside, and can easily be played at a non-peak time.

6: $100 max. Some might think this is low, might even think $150 is lowfor a 7. But consider that, when using off-season rates, the Bandon Dunes courses can be played for under $100, all of them being 7's orbetter, the number looks different. There are a lot of 6 qualitycourses out there that can be had for far less than $100 if one takestime to look around.

5: $75 max. This course is above average and worth the hard earnedmoney.

4: $55 max. Certainly don't spend more than this on a 4 course if you can help it. There are likely many other courses within closedistance that will be better values.

3: $40 max. This course is just average. No need to fork over more thana half-day's pay to play something that you feel is just average.

1 & 2: If you really consider a course to be a 1 or a 2, paywhatever you think is reasonable. For this writer, $20 is the maximum, and even then, it might feel like too much, depending on thecourse.

These numbers work two ways though. First is the initial evaluation. Thearchitectural quality is determined and a preliminary numberassigned. Typically desire to play will be a function of thisnumber, though that might be inflated or deflated by other factors.But if the preliminary rating was a 7, then you might look at therate page to determine if you felt the rate the club was asking wasreasonable. Bandon Dunes can be used as an example here. The ratethis time of year for a resort guest (and let's face it, baring anextraordinary circumstance, if you are playing Bandon, it will NOT beas a golf-only player) is $230 for the first round of the day and$115 for replay rounds. So, looking at those rates, all courses atthe resort are under their respective max cost. But does the desireexist to pay that max cost? Golfers willing to brave the elements canplay the course for less than 1/3 that peak rate. All depends onpriorities. Either way, that is how the max figures could be used inthe preliminary determination.

But these numbers can also be used after the fact. After playing a given course, golfers will often try to determine if it was worth the money they just paid. Sometimes they find they made a good decision, but sometimes the might feel that they did not. One story that comes tomind was when, not too long ago, this writer played a course that hadall the credentials to be top quality. Top notch Golden Age designer, seemingly solid routing, what appeared to be exceptional turfconditions and so forth. Initial research made this course out to bea 6 or better, worth the rate of $80 they were charging. But uponplay it became apparent that very little of the Golden Age designerswork was left, the routing was slightly above average, turfconditions were below what one would expect for that rate and thecourse was just generally a disappointment. It was not worth $80, notin the slightest. It was closer to a $50 course. This makes the $130 peak rate they charge even more befuddling. So in this situation, therate scale is used to make the decision as to whether or not you gotvalue for the money you paid.

But these numbers are generally reasonable and can be used as a good baseline to determine if you really want to play a course. Of course each golfer must determine what rates are acceptable for him or her, given their situations and desires. But I think all golfers would agree that if the opportunity to play Augusta National was afforded them tomorrow, this being a course that virtually all golfers would consider a 10 and the rest would surely consider a 9, they would do and pay whatever was necessary (while still being legal of course) toplay. That is the real definition of a 10 in terms of cost. Everything else just falls into place from there.

Fishhook Golf Course- Palmer, AK

This course is certainly from a mold formed in times past. The course is routed simply over the land. the  greens and tees are simply closely mown areas rather than expensively maintained and completely manufactured. This course, while not being anything special or unique to the world of golf, is a lot of fun to play and gives the golfer a look into how golf might have been played and courses designed years ago prior to the widespread use of heavy equipment.

Holes to Note

Hole #1: Par 5, 509 yards
This is a very good opening hole. The tee shot plays uphill and into the wind to a blind fairway. The best play off the tee will be for the player to play up the right hand side of the fairway. That will given him a chance to see the green. However, the green is tucked around a sharp corner and is very small, making for a very difficult target to hit with a fairway wood or long iron. This hole sets the pace for the rest of the round with the blind shots, small greens and difficult angles.

 From the tee, the hole spreads out nicely in front of the player. The center of the fairway lies where the high, unmaintained grass intersects  with the standard rough grass in the center of the image. The best line off the tee is slightly right of that point.

 With this hole playing into the prevailing wind, a 260 yard tee shot is a fair blast. From the left side of the fairway (obviously this writer does not possess the skill to execute the shot as directed) the green is still completely obscured.

Now, from around 125 yards, the green is plainly in view and easily accessed. Bunkers flank the green on both sides and the green is somewhat rectangular, giving a bit of a biarritz green set-up...though without the requisite depression.

Hole #3: Par 3, 150 yards

This green site is nicely shelved into the hillside beyond the green. The bunkers add quality framing features to the hole. The only problem on this hole is the routing. The player walks from two green to three tee, then to the green, but from the third green the player must double back the entire length of the hole, walk directly past the teeing ground and over a hill in order to get to the fourth tee. Given the old time, homely nature of the course though, perhaps it deserves a pass.

Hole #7: Par 4, 504 yards

Upon a non-exhaustive review, this appears to be the longest par 4 hole in Alaska. It plays slightly downhill off the tee, generally downwind and to a firm fairway. On a warm day like when this writer played, the hole can be rather easy. But on a day with temps in the mid-50's and lacking a helping wind, this hole must be a real beast. The hole plays with a slight dogleg left, downhill off the tee and slightly back uphill to the green. The bunker that lies on a line just left of the forward tee markers works as a strategic aim point. Left of the bunker is going to be severely penalized, as would going in the bunker. But playing close would cut some of the significant distance off the hole.

 As with Palmer Golf Course, located just a few miles away, the open nature of the course coupled with the mountains in the distance really skew the player's perspective. Those mountains are roughly five miles distant and the red roof marking the clubhouse is about 1,000 yards from this tee.

This green complex is, without doubt, the best on the course. It is guarded by no bunkers and is open in the front, but features significant run-off areas on the other three sides. Any golfer missing this green will be faced with a difficult recovery. 

Overall, this is a fun little golf course. It doesn't compete with the full eighteen hole courses in the area in terms of quality, but it shouldn't. It manages to carve out a niche in the market and promotes itself as such. This is an old style course with an old style feel. It does not try to be something it is not. It is simply a fun course to play. 2 out of 10.

Shell's Wonderful World of Golf @ Pine Valley Golf Club

This is an old, but still outstanding, tour around Pine Valley Golf Club in New Jersey. Pine Valley is a perennial Top 2 or 3 golf course in the world and has changed surprisingly little since this episode was shot in 1962. Enjoy.